; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 2 ; RUN: opt -disable-output "-passes=print" < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=DEFAULT ; RUN: opt -disable-output "-passes=print" -scalar-evolution-use-expensive-range-sharpening < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING ; This test exercises the following scenario: ; given: n > 0 ; for (i = 0, j = n - 1; i < n; i++, j--) { ; a = n - i; ; b = (n - 1) - i; ; c = 2147483647 - 1; ; } ; ; Note that value ranges of 'i' and 'j' are the same, just inverted. It means that ; they have same ranges and same no-wrap properties. 'b' is just an alternative ; way to compute the same value as 'j'. 'a' is effectively 'j + 1' and 'c' is a ; a positive value. All involved addrecs for 'i', 'j', 'a', 'b', 'c' should have ; no-sign-wrap flag. ; ; i's AddRec is expected to be proven no-sign-wrap ; j's AddRec is expected to be proven no-sign-wrap ; FIXME: a's AddRec is expected to be no-sign-wrap ; b's AddRec is expected to be no-sign-wrap ; FIXME: c's AddRec is expected to be no-sign-wrap ; i is expected to be non-negative ; j is expected to be non-negative ; a is expected to be positive ; b is expected to be non-negative ; c is expected to be positive define i32 @test_step_1_flags(i32 %n) { ; DEFAULT-LABEL: 'test_step_1_flags' ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @test_step_1_flags ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %n.minus.1 = sub nsw i32 %n, 1 ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> (-1 + %n) U: full-set S: full-set ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop ] ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {0,+,1}<%loop> U: [0,2147483647) S: [0,2147483647) Exits: (-1 + %n) LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %j = phi i32 [ %n.minus.1, %entry ], [ %j.next, %loop ] ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {(-1 + %n),+,-1}<%loop> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: 0 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %a = sub i32 %n, %i ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {%n,+,-1}<%loop> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: 1 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %b = sub i32 %n.minus.1, %i ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {(-1 + %n),+,-1}<%loop> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: 0 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %c = sub i32 2147483647, %i ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {2147483647,+,-1}<%loop> U: [1,-2147483648) S: [1,-2147483648) Exits: (-2147483648 + (-1 * %n)) LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %i.next = add nuw nsw i32 %i, 1 ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {1,+,1}<%loop> U: [1,-2147483648) S: [1,-2147483648) Exits: %n LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: %j.next = add nsw i32 %j, -1 ; DEFAULT-NEXT: --> {(-2 + %n),+,-1}<%loop> U: full-set S: full-set Exits: -1 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_step_1_flags ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n) ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Loop %loop: constant max backedge-taken count is 2147483646 ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Loop %loop: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n) ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Loop %loop: Predicated backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n) ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Predicates: ; DEFAULT-NEXT: Loop %loop: Trip multiple is 1 ; ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-LABEL: 'test_step_1_flags' ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Classifying expressions for: @test_step_1_flags ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %n.minus.1 = sub nsw i32 %n, 1 ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> (-1 + %n) U: full-set S: full-set ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop ] ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {0,+,1}<%loop> U: [0,2147483647) S: [0,2147483647) Exits: (-1 + %n) LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %j = phi i32 [ %n.minus.1, %entry ], [ %j.next, %loop ] ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {(-1 + %n),+,-1}<%loop> U: [0,2147483647) S: [0,2147483647) Exits: 0 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %a = sub i32 %n, %i ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {%n,+,-1}<%loop> U: [1,-2147483648) S: [1,-2147483648) Exits: 1 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %b = sub i32 %n.minus.1, %i ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {(-1 + %n),+,-1}<%loop> U: [0,2147483647) S: [0,2147483647) Exits: 0 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %c = sub i32 2147483647, %i ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {2147483647,+,-1}<%loop> U: [1,-2147483648) S: [1,-2147483648) Exits: (-2147483648 + (-1 * %n)) LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %i.next = add nuw nsw i32 %i, 1 ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {1,+,1}<%loop> U: [1,-2147483648) S: [1,-2147483648) Exits: %n LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: %j.next = add nsw i32 %j, -1 ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: --> {(-2 + %n),+,-1}<%loop> U: full-set S: [-1,2147483646) Exits: -1 LoopDispositions: { %loop: Computable } ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Determining loop execution counts for: @test_step_1_flags ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Loop %loop: backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n) ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Loop %loop: constant max backedge-taken count is 2147483646 ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Loop %loop: symbolic max backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n) ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Loop %loop: Predicated backedge-taken count is (-1 + %n) ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Predicates: ; EXPENSIVE_SHARPENING-NEXT: Loop %loop: Trip multiple is 1 ; entry: %n.minus.1 = sub nsw i32 %n, 1 %precond = icmp sgt i32 %n, 0 br i1 %precond, label %loop, label %fail loop: %i = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%i.next, %loop] ; 0...n-1 %j = phi i32 [%n.minus.1, %entry], [%j.next, %loop] ; n-1...0 %a = sub i32 %n, %i ; n...1 %b = sub i32 %n.minus.1, %i ; n-1...0 %c = sub i32 2147483647, %i ; 2147483647...1 %i.next = add nuw nsw i32 %i, 1 %j.next = add nsw i32 %j, -1 %cond = icmp slt i32 %i.next, %n br i1 %cond, label %loop, label %exit fail: ret i32 -1 exit: ret i32 0 }