// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -ffreestanding -verify -std=c2x %s /* WG14 N3035: yes * _BitInt Fixes */ #include /* intmax_t and uintmax_t don't need to be able to represent all of the values * of a bit-precise integer type. We test this by using a bit-precise integer * suffix on some huge values used within the preprocessor. */ #if 0x1'FFFF'FFFF'FFFF'FFFFwb == 0 /* expected-error {{integer literal is too large to be represented in any integer type}} */ #endif /* Yet we can use that value as an initializer... */ _BitInt(66) Val = 0x1'FFFF'FFFF'FFFF'FFFFwb; /* ...so long as the type is wide enough. */ intmax_t WrongVal = 0x1'FFFF'FFFF'FFFF'FFFFwb; /* expected-warning-re {{implicit conversion from '_BitInt(66)' to 'intmax_t' (aka '{{.*}}') changes value from 36893488147419103231 to -1}} */ /* None of the types in stdint.h may be defined in terms of a bit-precise * integer type. This macro presumes that if the type is not one of the builtin * scalar integer types, the type must be a bit-precise type. We're using this * because C does not have a particularly straightforward way to use _Generic * with arbitrary bit-precise integer types. */ #define IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(TYPE) _Generic((TYPE){ 0 }, \ short : 1, int : 1, long : 1, long long : 1, \ unsigned short : 1, unsigned int : 1, \ unsigned long : 1, unsigned long long : 1, \ char : 1, signed char : 1, unsigned char : 1,\ default : 0) static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(int8_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(uint8_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(int16_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(uint16_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(int32_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(uint32_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(int64_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(uint64_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(intmax_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(uintmax_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(intptr_t)); static_assert(IS_NOT_BIT_PRECISE(uintptr_t)); /* FIXME: N3035 also added wording disallowing using a bit-precise integer type * as the compatible type for an enumerated type. However, we don't have a * direct way to test that, so we're claiming conformance without test * coverage. */