// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors #if __cplusplus >= 201103L namespace dr2211 { // dr2211: 8 void f() { int a; auto f = [a](int a) { (void)a; }; // since-cxx11-error@-1 {{a lambda parameter cannot shadow an explicitly captured entity}} // since-cxx11-note@-2 {{variable 'a' is explicitly captured here}} auto g = [=](int a) { (void)a; }; } } #endif namespace dr2213 { // dr2213: yes template struct A; template struct A; } // namespace dr2213 namespace dr2229 { // dr2229: 7 struct AnonBitfieldQualifiers { const unsigned : 1; // expected-error@-1 {{anonymous bit-field cannot have qualifiers}} volatile unsigned : 1; // expected-error@-1 {{anonymous bit-field cannot have qualifiers}} const volatile unsigned : 1; // expected-error@-1 {{anonymous bit-field cannot have qualifiers}} unsigned : 1; const unsigned i1 : 1; volatile unsigned i2 : 1; const volatile unsigned i3 : 1; }; } namespace dr2233 { // dr2233: 11 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L template void f(int i = 0, T... args) {} template void g(int i = 0, T... args, T... args2) {} template void h(int i = 0, T... args, int j = 1) {} template void i(int i = 0, T... args, int j = 1, U... args2) {} template void j(int i = 0, Ts... ts) {} template <> void j(int i, int j) {} template void j(int, int, int); extern template void j(int, int, int, int); // PR23029 // Ensure instantiating the templates works. void use() { f(); f(0, 1); f(1, 2); g(1, 2, 3); h(0, 1); i(); i(3); i(3, 2); i(3, 2, 1); i(1, 2, 3, 4, 5); j(); j(1); j(1, 2); j(1, 2); } namespace MultilevelSpecialization { template struct A { template void f(int i = 0, int (&... arr)[V]); }; template<> template<> void A::f<1, 1>(int i, int (&arr1a)[1], int (&arr2a)[1]) {} // FIXME: I believe this example is valid, at least up to the first explicit // specialization, but Clang can't cope with explicit specializations that // expand packs into a sequence of parameters. If we ever start accepting // that, we'll need to decide whether it's OK for arr1a to be missing its // default argument -- how far back do we look when determining whether a // parameter was expanded from a pack? // -- zygoloid 2020-06-02 template struct B { template void f(int i = 0, int (&... arr)[V]); }; template<> template void B::f(int i, int (&arr1)[a], int (&arr2)[b]) {} // since-cxx11-error@-1 {{out-of-line definition of 'f' does not match any declaration in 'dr2233::MultilevelSpecialization::B'}} template<> template<> void B::f<1, 1>(int i, int (&arr1a)[1], int (&arr2a)[1]) {} } namespace CheckAfterMerging1 { template void f() { void g(int, int = 0); void g(int = 0, T...); g(); } void h() { f(); } } namespace CheckAfterMerging2 { template void f() { void g(int = 0, T...); void g(int, int = 0); g(); } void h() { f(); } } #endif } // namespace dr2233 namespace dr2267 { // dr2267: no #if __cplusplus >= 201103L struct A {} a; struct B { explicit B(const A&); }; // #dr2267-struct-B struct D { D(); }; struct C { explicit operator D(); } c; B b1(a); const B &b2{a}; // FIXME ill-formed const B &b3(a); // since-cxx11-error@-1 {{no viable conversion from 'struct A' to 'const B'}} // since-cxx11-note@#dr2267-struct-B {{candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'struct A' to 'const B &' for 1st argument}} // since-cxx11-note@#dr2267-struct-B {{candidate constructor (the implicit move constructor) not viable: no known conversion from 'struct A' to 'B &&' for 1st argument}} // since-cxx11-note@#dr2267-struct-B {{explicit constructor is not a candidate}} D d1(c); const D &d2{c}; // FIXME ill-formed const D &d3(c); // FIXME ill-formed #endif } namespace dr2292 { // dr2292: 9 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L template using id = T; void test(int *p) { p->template id::~id(); } #endif }